In English, participle clauses are often used to express actions happening at the same time as the main verb. In this case, the sentence in question uses a participle clause with the word ‘trying.’ However, there’s some confusion about the use of the word ‘all’ and whether it’s necessary in this context. Let’s break down the question and explore the grammatical structure in more detail.
What is a Participle Clause?
A participle clause is a clause that uses a present participle or past participle to provide additional information about the main action or to express time, cause, or condition. In the sentence, ‘Books are published and magazine articles are written on the subject, all trying to tell job-seekers what they should do in order to survive the game,’ the word ‘trying’ functions as a present participle that modifies the previous clauses, providing additional information about the books and magazine articles.
Here, ‘trying’ is part of a participle clause that explains the purpose of the books and magazine articles. The clause is functioning to describe the action of these publications, which is to ‘tell job-seekers what they should do.’
Is ‘All’ Necessary in This Sentence?
The question suggests that ‘all’ might be unnecessary in the sentence. This is an interesting point because ‘all’ is used to refer to the books and magazine articles collectively. The concern is whether this word is redundant, as it could be implied by the context. The answer lies in the structure of the sentence. In English, we sometimes use ‘all’ to emphasize that everything mentioned in the preceding part of the sentence is included in the participle clause.
While it may seem that ‘all’ is unnecessary, it serves a purpose in this sentence. It emphasizes that both books and magazine articles are involved in the action of trying to help job-seekers. The sentence would still be grammatically correct without ‘all,’ but it may lose some of its emphasis or clarity.
Understanding the Use of ‘All’ in Context
In many cases, ‘all’ is used to reinforce the collective nature of an action or idea. In this case, the word ‘all’ helps to clarify that the books and articles are collectively working towards the same goal. It gives more weight to the idea that these publications are not individual efforts, but rather part of a larger movement aimed at helping job-seekers.
For example, without ‘all,’ the sentence would read: ‘Books are published and magazine articles are written on the subject, trying to tell job-seekers what they should do in order to survive the game.’ This version is still correct, but it feels less cohesive and less unified in its expression.
Conclusion: The Role of ‘All’ and Participle Clauses
The use of participle clauses in English helps to condense information and make sentences more fluid. In this case, the participle clause with ‘trying’ effectively conveys the purpose of the books and articles. As for the use of ‘all,’ it’s not strictly necessary but does add emphasis and clarity to the sentence. Depending on the desired tone and clarity, ‘all’ can be included or omitted without changing the fundamental meaning of the sentence.
コメント